Verdicts & Settlements A good result. Isn't that what you're looking for when you or a family member has been seriously injured due to the negligence of someone else - or even worse, lost their life. And I would imagine your probably wondering what's possible when you have a very good Injury Attorney working for you? Just below is a sampling of some of the results I have obtained for my clients. I'd like the opportunity to try and do the same for you. I ask that you take a quick look at the results and when you're ready to spend a few minutes on the phone to tell me what happened to you or your family member, call me at (202) 741-9348. The call is free and I'll answer your questions - and most likely ask you a few questions as well. And if I can help, I will. Results Is What Matters Plaintiff was a retired veteran visiting the Washington, DC area sightseeing with his wife and family. Due to his age, plaintiff utilized a scooter to travel between places. During a shuttle bus trip which was equipped to transport the plaintiff and the scooter from the metro station to the hotel in Virginia, the driver of the hotel's shuttle bus failed to strap the scooter in place. During the trip, the driver braked and caused the scooter to fall on top of the plaintiff. As a result, the plaintiff was taken to the hospital and suffered numerous injuries which lasted many years. Counsel for plaintiff obtained a confindential, seven figure settlement on behalf of the plaintiff. Because the results obtained in specific cases depend on a variety of factors unique to each case, past case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in future cases undertaken by a lawyer or law firm. Obtained a jury verdict for $767,000 in a medical malpractice lawsuit for a woman who was admitted into Washington Hospital Center for bypass surgery. During her admission at Washington Hospital Center, the doctors and nurses failed to monitor her breathing tube and left the breathing too long in the Plaintiff's airway. As a result of the prolonged intubation, Plaintiff suffered permanent damage to her larynx and vocal cords that caused her to have trouble breathing and speaking. Because the results obtained in specific cases depend on a variety of factors unique to each case, past case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in future cases undertaken by a lawyer or law firm. Gabriel Assaad was involved in a very large confidential settlement for a young college man who was transfused blood during a hospitalization at a hospital in Washington, DC. The Plaintiff was a young man who was awaiting a second kidney transplant and was planning on receiving a transplant from a family member in a few months. During a hospitalization, the physician administered a blood transfusion to the plaintiff which caused him to develop new antibodies and therefore was no longer a match for the kidney that was previously an acceptable match. In addition, because of the blood transfusion, the plaintiff was not a match for 99% of the kidneys in the population. Thankfully, many years after the transfusion, a miracle occurred and an acceptable match was ultimately found. However, during those years, plaintiff suffered extreme emotional depression and had to obtain dialysis three times a week. Because the results obtained in specific cases depend on a variety of factors unique to each case, past case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in future cases undertaken by a lawyer or law firm. Gabriel Assaad represented the family of the decedent in a medical malpractice and wrongful death action. The decedent was a diabetic who was admitted into a DC hospital and had gas gangrene, a severe infection, in his foot. After being admitted to the Emergency Room, the hospital left him in the hall of the emergency room for over twenty-four hours. Due to the extended time the decedent was not treated and left in the hall way, he went into diabetic shock and dies following a routine procedure. The case settled shortly after filing the lawsuit for a very large confidential settlement. Because the results obtained in specific cases depend on a variety of factors unique to each case, past case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in future cases undertaken by a lawyer or law firm. Obtained a six figure settlement on the eve before trial. Plaintiff was successful businessman in Maryland who was diagnosed with a rare cancer in his nasal area. During the surgery, the physician packed the nasal cavity and instructed the nursing staff to perform neurological tests regularly. Unfortunately, the nurse on duty was a traveling nurse and was unaware of the complications that can occur. The packing caused pressure on the optical nerve and caused the plaintiff to go blind. Although the patient complained of problems with his eyesight and they were noted in the medical record, the traveling nurse failed to notify the surgeon. As a result, the plaintiff became blind in one eye. Because the results obtained in specific cases depend on a variety of factors unique to each case, past case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in future cases undertaken by a lawyer or law firm. Plaintiff v. National Department Store: Plaintiff was an employee at National Department Store. During the end of her shift, Plaintiff was taken by security and interrogated for over 3 hours regarding a piece of chocolate the Department Store alleged she had taken without paying. During the process, the Department Store declined to provide a translator, yelled at the Plaintiff, kept the Plaintiff in a small hot room, and would not allow the Plaintiff’s spouse to see her. At the end, Plaintiff fainted and was taken to a local hospital. Plaintiff filed suit against the Department Store for assault, battery, intention infliction of emotion distress, unlawful detainment, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Defendant settled early in litigation for a confidential amount. Because the results obtained in specific cases depend on a variety of factors unique to each case, past case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in future cases undertaken by a lawyer or law firm. Plaintiff v. National Convenience Store: Plaintiff was on the premise of a convenience store in which the convenience store placed a concrete car stop at the end of the pedestrian ramp. After the Plaintiff completed her purchases at the convenience store, she exited the building and proceeded to her automobile. As she was going down the pedestrian ramp, the cart hit the concrete stop and caused the Plaintiff to fall onto the concrete stop. As a result, the Plaintiff fractured both femur and was rushed to the hospital in which she had surgery that night. Plaintiff filed suit against the convenience store for negligence and negligence per se for violating the building codes of the area. Defendant settled with Plaintiff weeks before trial for a large confidential amount. Because the results obtained in specific cases depend on a variety of factors unique to each case, past case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in future cases undertaken by a lawyer or law firm. Plaintiff v. Driver: Plaintiff was crossing the street in Washington, DC when a driver took a left turn and hit the Plaintiff. The driver was on his cell phone at the time and was not paying attention to pedestrians crossing the street. Counsel for Plaintiff settled the case prior to filing suit for $210,000.00. Because the results obtained in specific cases depend on a variety of factors unique to each case, past case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in future cases undertaken by a lawyer or law firm.

® Copyright . All rights reserved.